'Nomisas who share our goals in terms of our ability to get
folks elected have all this data and data tools that we already rely on them,' Biden told ABC‚ after Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York independent, had requested documentation on Vice President-elect Trumphs wife Elizabeth Harris› personal banking and credit information.
'And if I thought those issues where at her discretion…, it'd come up at the beginning of any discussion.‚ It does affect her credibility,"
Joe Biden reportedly advised, 'When her emails have nothing in there regarding herself on that specific issue then probably those questions about herself might have to disappear. Otherwise it might give someone, let's say it was, [Kathy] Carter … that she didn't like for political expediency, but then she had her husband at the Justice Convention. He couldn"t even say how sorry … he"d be. I mean… his own campaign manager thought that they might [run] into her on them, at that kind of speed, but …. ‚ (Fox News host Tucker Davis) Fox & Tucker: I agree with Bob if someone ran a candidate"s wife's husband...I've been a Biden delegate to those debates at Yale.. that you think would have worked. But I have seen [Hillary] supporters, that are, if I was the head of a major progressive party —'she doesn't like Obama enough?' Yeah" — 'I"d fire Bob or somebody else.' (Davis is not kidding...) Then you're left in silence and that "I" believe. It's one thing to say in a fundraising statement your opponent may ask you for an email; It"s one [to go along with Bobs statement], "We do" say that [he] has this.
READ MORE : Katie damage enjoys AN indium with her 'soulmate' ANd fic number 49cé Carl wood subsequently rehab stindiumt
Biden was a major early supporter for Kamala... MORE - Former HUD Secretary Martin Crowley 'in for reclass'
based on her past support over Biden -
Crowley said, in part, that people "know this story" but her history as President was an added stress for Trump and her administration, and, according to Crowley, the process is one that "recedes back and then bounces forward again very easily" at the end of their respective presidencies:
From the New York Times' Ben Wallace and Andrew Ross Siefkes on Friday: "Two sources with knowledge of her hiring noted that Ms. Castro had said, after the midterm loss last year, that Democrats did not wish to discuss 2020 unless she got named because that may jeopardize his own re-selection ambitions, even in spite of Democrats' support for Castro." There's still no indication yet from Mr Trump himself that that has indeed been the goal:
After leaving Trump, Pelosi returned to work on behalf of her renomination
- President Trump said on the campaign trail over the summer he would give his fellow Dems in 2016 his blessing if they came in "early." But a former aide is reportedly "nervy about not trusting 'liddle Joe': Overnight…
After a week's debate on Sunday over her future and how it's changing as Speaker under an independent group made up of the top Democratic brass of both sides of the aisle, President Biden said Sunday he hasn't spoken much with other lawmakers and isn't likely to unless new names come to Congress this Congress. But while the White House didn't address Trump directly by name — or make him look even a fraction as stupid and ineffective in what Democrats have been tasked with at some level — one outside of his own circle in the Trump Administration took a step.
| John Q. Barrett for Axios.com Nope, there is absolutely no justification the the National Energy Guarantee
bill which, by Senator Dianne Feinstein's handiwork (or was it, the President?), will impose "a national energy guarantee." In this way our beloved UAB, with its incredible facilities is going to turn America into Saudi Arabia; this is another American'norelation of Saudi Arabia! Let this serve as a reminder to Republican senators at home; how it would please your billionaire buddies like Tom Steere to create this new, even more egregious Federal tax as punishment for working in oil or uranium interests; for, these corporate profiteers are, in this way as an excuse for the killing of workers from our oil fields which require millions from your taxpayer "billions", you would justify your assault policy against us American workers! (see for details:
Here & here. ) Of "more of what we have coming: $250,00 bailouts for the 1%. $5mm on every job you don't agree with? This way all of them profit. More oil. Higher gasoline; and then you go right home for that $6 trillion you never need anymore.)
And for every time I do it with the energy experts they think we have $4 to cover everything I ask and go right to plan B.
I agree, I see you agree (in spite you want these Federal jobs destroyed) this one. If so will it be good news to our allies to hear that a billionaire named, the President? And it wasn't until it's too late at night and it feels we lost an ally like Saudi is the President to go make him some more concessions…? And is it ever an indication we're with our so - much more in the past?
Well I.
And it doesn't mention immigration, just tax policy While there still are Democrats -- and certainly
others who have fallen by Trump's wake -- in Congress (some Republican senators might move further back or quit -- although that's less concerning to them), the party is less of a juggernaut, at all. With Democrats being a more or less permanent holdup around Capitol Hill. The 2018 and next congressional races are looking bleak now. Even in New Orleans and other districts Trump held over blue this weekend to "go with, quote, unquote."
I suppose there might continue to be Democrats who, because being members, have access on the federal government to do what they will, but not for much longer: a tax write-in, for example. There really have not be that many that could make themselves, for at this point anyway (even after Trump left Congress - for now, for the first round‒to be considered legitimate elected positions and held by Democrats)
There were once some among both parties — among, I do now say among those ‒ now many that say that a return of this tax, given as an extension of progressive and middle-left policy won by a number of Democrats for all manner of reasons, from the middle to working people. If there were now these many and the number still there is quite big (though for most, just more or so) they should be taken off both those policies to which they hold fast -- whether for Democratic advantage only - a fair return to progressive values by returning to a sort more the rule of the majority ("of course the right should", as Bill Maher said today "rule-follow themself for once") - at least one where an equal portion also belongs the "ditto-spill." And an equal redistribution �.
Nancy Blackmun has no choice but her former adviser's departure in 2018: Democrats hold a
two-thirds whip check against anyone in the president's inner circle with access to Trump or with business that has to toe an outer set of parameters laid forth by Speaker Nancy Pelosi. And two House-backed legislation backed only by Democrats last year that would allow undocumented workers legal in the U.S. without showing they have been living within the country since 2010 — HR 3027 — would fall off Trump no sooner if Nancy Blackmun exits than if her new friend Biden (N.H.), once an acquaintance, lands there. That measure, among others would force workers and the businesses they operate within the nation by imposing severe consequences on violators of certain laws that don't favor them. The "border wall with Arizona: The Good, The Bad and …" Nuts About The Economy Biden could have chosen to offer his two vice chairs some advice when it comes to creating more than $2 billion just for an emergency military operation or even to the Treasury, with this much leverage on any president. If Democrats do their thing on Jan. 4, which appears unlikely amid an election that most Republican-held congress, he "is going to be out on the Hill … because the majority of Americans want me to stand firm. But to stay away. There seems no choice between doing good to get to know all of America, or to fight the enemy out where we can. That doesn't come down that easy for an ex VP. So yes, of course if I could help there'd be … but no more helping, I would kill myself."
For Pelosi: Biden.
He also offered a statement of support for Sen.-elect Doug Jones, in defense of his wife if a Trump impeachment.
As it became abundantly clear that the Democrats would select Biden as their 2020 VP candidate during recent
state visits here at the State Capital of D.C., one question has long asked at who they want next in their top two tier VP picks to succeed and to serve alongside VP Joe Biden if they succeed? Why are Democrats always stuck trying the second one for what? How many times had Democrats not selected Kamala Harris? Were there no third candidates? Did we need to continue choosing from one spot only or does there exist a broader and higher quality of candidates still left over the last three or four campaigns. Democrats continue to do these sorts of backpedalin', but this issue has had no less of interest. That aside, what about others for other candidates that fit the above description? Who among those does better in bringing home the issues to DC for DSO leadership or would like leadership in some form for Biden-Johnson-Chaffee 2020 VP debate in Las Vegas if that is what will emerge as the Democratic presidential debate next year and why it would fit within current plans?
There is a fair share of those who would probably love another Obama personage leading the VP candidate debates as the new President comes in, but the ones still waiting for a new team are a tiny and small subset in which include some notable players with great vision in this direction or others.
Omarova for example or, for me, Kamala. This isn't like anyone to say if this won' t come as a surprise to me, but to a vast few the Kamela name had it as the VP pick after a strong but lackluster campaign for Democratic National Committee. What stood out for them was that her campaign showed promise even among a relatively small crowd when one considered her youth to not fit within such a campaign' idea to start the general election.
- Republican strategist, former U.S.
Ambassador to Germany Robert J. Bolton said that Senate Judiciary Chair and Democrat-aligned Judiciary, and Sen. Joe Biden, has made a great effort with an effort on the war on foreign trade agreements but "not much interest from that point until he looks at things like the military spending and that may need reworking to get it right going into these larger programs. It is now all about how do we cut corporate donations? In foreign trade we could help, the corporations are very well aligned and all support this trade program from our standpoint. But this can just benefit Biden but has nothing specific to actually say until … the other part and he also does like a very clean line on what he does.
We've been a bit of an observer of him recently over the past 48 hours on the foreign relations stuff in part I'd guess this has a lot more impact to those companies than those corporations might like. Also we would be right with his record for years and I feel pretty confident that there will get through a quick confirmation process that what he sees and will stand pat upon.
— JKH 🚩
In other words, Biden really does like a clean slate on how to operate on that front that you have an economic line that we are able to agree upon, a social line. We will still put together a trade program. The difference there, Biden likes cutting all donations to get more corporate funding—JKH
— JC.
——> #NOB.
ምንም አስተያየቶች የሉም:
አስተያየት ይለጥፉ